🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an cute little “sweetheart”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a large but fiercely protective friend. Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and moves like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “most affectionate” with a gentle spirit.

A group of thirty captive marine mammals in a Canada-based entertainment facility have been entangled in a disagreement between a closed attraction, public officials and welfare campaigners.

But those closest to the whales say the heated debate over their fate often fails to consider the nuances of the whales who, after spending their lives in captivity, have been carefully observed by the humans who see them each day.

After the federal government blocked the sale of the belugas to a foreign facility, the embattled amusement park near Niagara Falls where they are housed threatened to euthanize them unless the authorities covers the upkeep of their care. The nation’s marine resources official has denied that demand, placing the thirty whales in an increasingly precarious situation.

Highly Cognitive Marine Mammals

Scientists say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their sound replication, cognitive challenges and communal behavior point to they are remarkably smart animals – something one caretaker learned personally.

She spent a significant period as a marine mammal specialist, a position that involved building relationships of the sea creatures.

“Building up those relationships over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of love. At the beginning, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so extraordinary and rewarding.”

Burgess knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was even so astounded by the details and idiosyncrasies in their personalities. She cultivated a special affection for a pair of whales with opposing temperaments.

“Eve chose me. Cleo demanded work,” she said. “Each changed the way I perceive bonding.”

Growing Opposition and Facility Decline

Her interaction with the whales developed against a backdrop of rising activist criticism to their captivity.

During her three years at the attraction, seven belugas and the park’s single orca, the orca, succumbed. In total, 19 belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a number which the facility ascribes to expected lifespan, but which campaigners say reflects the poor conditions in which they were housed.

The facility did not admit visitors to the visitors over the summer, but the former trainer says she observed directly consequences of the cessation. “Structural materials is deteriorating from the pools because they’re in disrepair and not being maintained. The whales are curious and so they take pieces and swim around with chunks in their jaws. It’s distressing to see.”

The facility did not reply to a questionnaire, but in the past asserted: “The whales … get far higher quality medical attention and 24/7 supervision than any person in the UK, or anywhere else.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

Burgess was terminated from the facility in early March following the passing of a beluga, an ailing beluga the park staff had to put down. She said the park thought information of the incident were shared to the news outlets and she was let go not long after.

The lack of clarity over the whales’ outcome has left Burgess and other caretakers in distress. She says the facility’s warning to end the lives of its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “practically unfeasible” task, adding any attempts to humanely kill even a individual beluga would require “immense personnel”, equipment and specialized tools.

“There’s no way in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess backs demands for the whales to be taken right away from the park, with its failing enclosures and shrinking team.

In late September, Canada’s government official denied a request to send the whales to an overseas location.

“Allowing the proposal would have meant a continued situation in confinement and a return to display for amusement,” the official commented. “As the public, we know that marine mammals belong in the ocean, not in tanks for our entertainment. I could not in good conscience permit an transfer that would prolong the treatment these belugas have endured.”

But Burgess said the minister’s comments reveal a more general incorrect perception of the facts of living conditions for belugas raised in confinement.

“The society needs to grasp these are whales that have lived entirely in enclosed habitats and they will need human care for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “The public just don’t realize that it’s not as easy as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Continuing Discussion

As officials attempt to find a resolution, proposals have surfaced, some of which have questionable practicality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be released into the open waters of the Arctic – where whales are a primary resource of food for Indigenous peoples.

A suggested refuge in the province of eastern Canada, which recently received regulatory clearance, has been highly debated. The future site, which includes a large area of penned in ocean, remains undeveloped. Advocates remain hopeful that it could ultimately represent a long term solution for some of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among trainers she’s spoken with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “only an trial” in the whales’ future.

Different voices say the prospect of a sanctuary indicates a changing attitudes away from animal displays and could represent a workable approach in the near future.

Charles Vinick, director of the initiative, said the site will simulate the intellectual stimulation and nutrition the whales receive from specialists, albeit in a significantly bigger environment. He said after the medical condition of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|